Filed: Aug. 27, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1654 FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KING CASTLE MOTEL; PENN MAR THERAPEUTIC CENTER, et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01405-RDB) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francis Aki
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1654 FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KING CASTLE MOTEL; PENN MAR THERAPEUTIC CENTER, et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01405-RDB) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francis Akin..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1654 FRANCIS AKINRO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KING CASTLE MOTEL; PENN MAR THERAPEUTIC CENTER, et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01405-RDB) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. King Castle Motel, No. 1:10-cv-01405-RDB (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
