Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Breen v. Guttman, 09-2340 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-2340 Visitors: 140
Filed: Aug. 31, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2340 In Re: JOHN S. BREEN; TERESA J. BREEN, Debtors. - JOHN S. BREEN; TERESA J. BREEN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ZVI GUTTMAN, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circ
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2340 In Re: JOHN S. BREEN; TERESA J. BREEN, Debtors. --------------------------------------- JOHN S. BREEN; TERESA J. BREEN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ZVI GUTTMAN, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John S. Breen, Teresa J. Breen, Appellants Pro Se. Zvi Guttman, LAW OFFICES OF ZVI GUTTMAN, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breen v. Guttman, Nos. 1:09-cv-02315-RDB; BK-02-58017-RAG (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2009; filed Nov. 3, 2009, entered Nov. 4, 2009. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer