Filed: Sep. 13, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1057 BILONDA WA KALONJI; ALULA NICKY KADIMA, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: September 13, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth A. Kohler, LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD S. BROMBERG,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1057 BILONDA WA KALONJI; ALULA NICKY KADIMA, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: September 13, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth A. Kohler, LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD S. BROMBERG, W..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1057
BILONDA WA KALONJI; ALULA NICKY KADIMA,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: September 13, 2010
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elizabeth A. Kohler, LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD S. BROMBERG,
Washington, D.C., for Petitioners. Tony West, Assistant Attorney
General, Francis W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Linda Y.
Cheng, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bilonda Wa Kalonji and Alula Nicky Kadima, natives and
citizens of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, petition for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying their motion to reopen and reconsider. We have reviewed
the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the
denial of relief on Petitioners’ motion. See 8 C.F.R.
§§ 1003.2(a), (b), (c) (2010). We accordingly deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Wa
Kalonji (B.I.A. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2