Filed: Oct. 01, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1831 BRIAN L. DAVIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT/SPECIAL EDUCATION, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00084-RBS-TEM) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1831 BRIAN L. DAVIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT/SPECIAL EDUCATION, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00084-RBS-TEM) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1831 BRIAN L. DAVIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. HAMPTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT/SPECIAL EDUCATION, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00084-RBS-TEM) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brian L. Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his federal action against the Hampton Public School District. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Davis v. Hampton Pub. Sch. Dist./Special Educ., No. 4:10-cv- 00084-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. July 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
