Filed: Oct. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6895 JOHNNIE GATHERS, a/k/a Johnny Gathers, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WILLIE EAGLETON; J. BETHEA; S. GOLDBERG; W. MCCRAE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:09-cv-01295-HMH) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Af
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6895 JOHNNIE GATHERS, a/k/a Johnny Gathers, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JON OZMINT; WILLIE EAGLETON; J. BETHEA; S. GOLDBERG; W. MCCRAE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:09-cv-01295-HMH) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Aff..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6895
JOHNNIE GATHERS, a/k/a Johnny Gathers,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT; WILLIE EAGLETON; J. BETHEA; S. GOLDBERG; W.
MCCRAE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (9:09-cv-01295-HMH)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnnie Gathers, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III,
AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnnie Gathers appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Gathers v. Ozmint, No. 9:09-cv-01295-HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 15, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2