Filed: Oct. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7002 BERNARD MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SIMON MAJOR, Director of Sumter Lee Regional Detention Center, in his individual or personal capacity; RAY LEE, Captain, Records Officer and Accountant, in his individual or personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02437-RBH) Submitted:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7002 BERNARD MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SIMON MAJOR, Director of Sumter Lee Regional Detention Center, in his individual or personal capacity; RAY LEE, Captain, Records Officer and Accountant, in his individual or personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02437-RBH) Submitted: S..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7002
BERNARD MCFADDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SIMON MAJOR, Director of Sumter Lee Regional Detention
Center, in his individual or personal capacity; RAY LEE,
Captain, Records Officer and Accountant, in his individual
or personal capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (6:09-cv-02437-RBH)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel
Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint with prejudice
for lack of prosecution. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See McFadden v. Major, No.
6:09-cv-02437-RBH (D.S.C. July 9, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2