Filed: Oct. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7111 DWIGHT XAVIER JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS; DENNIS A. TRACY; SERGEANT KLAUSEN, Lexington County Detention Center; NFN MICKEN, Lexington County Detention Center: JAMES R. METTS, Lexington County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants – Appellees, and LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, LCMANET; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for th
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7111 DWIGHT XAVIER JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS; DENNIS A. TRACY; SERGEANT KLAUSEN, Lexington County Detention Center; NFN MICKEN, Lexington County Detention Center: JAMES R. METTS, Lexington County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants – Appellees, and LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, LCMANET; LEXINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7111
DWIGHT XAVIER JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS; DENNIS A. TRACY; SERGEANT
KLAUSEN, Lexington County Detention Center; NFN MICKEN,
Lexington County Detention Center: JAMES R. METTS, Lexington
County Sheriff’s Department,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, LCMANET; LEXINGTON
COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (0:09-cv-00269-HMH)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwight Xavier Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Amanda R. Maybank,
MAYBANK LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Daniel C.
Plyler, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwight Xavier Jones appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Jones v. Corr. Care Solutions, No. 0:09-cv-00269-HMH (D.S.C.
July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3