Filed: Oct. 15, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1531 LEONA VICTORS (Emenyonu); HOME CARE, INC., a/k/a Leona’s Heart Assisted Living, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WENDY A. KRONMILLER; JANE WESSELY; BARBARA SHANNON; ED SADLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02282-JFM) Submitted: September 20, 2010 Decided: October 15, 2010 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1531 LEONA VICTORS (Emenyonu); HOME CARE, INC., a/k/a Leona’s Heart Assisted Living, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WENDY A. KRONMILLER; JANE WESSELY; BARBARA SHANNON; ED SADLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:07-cv-02282-JFM) Submitted: September 20, 2010 Decided: October 15, 2010 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, a..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1531
LEONA VICTORS (Emenyonu); HOME CARE, INC., a/k/a Leona’s
Heart Assisted Living,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WENDY A. KRONMILLER; JANE WESSELY; BARBARA SHANNON; ED
SADLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-02282-JFM)
Submitted: September 20, 2010 Decided: October 15, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael R. Carithers, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants.
Kathleen A. Ellis, Rhonda L. Stout, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Dale Barton Garbutt,
Dennis M. Robinson, Jr., WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leona Victors and Home Care, Inc., appeal the district
court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the
Defendants on their civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§§ 1983 and 1985 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Victors v. Kronmiller, No. 1:07-
cv-02282-JFM (D. Md. April 8, 2009). We grant the motion to
waive appendix requirements and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2