Filed: Jan. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7144 ROBERT K. ELLIS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. D. BERKEBILE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00931) Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011 Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rober
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7144 ROBERT K. ELLIS, Petitioner – Appellant, v. D. BERKEBILE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00931) Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011 Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7144
ROBERT K. ELLIS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
D. BERKEBILE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00931)
Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 4, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert K. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Dee Pyne Crane, BUREAU
OF PRISONS, Beaver, West Virginia, Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert K. Ellis, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies and the court’s order denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders on the reasoning set forth therein. See Ellis v.
Berkebile, No. 5:10-cv-00931 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 6, 2010 & Oct. 1,
2010). We also deny Ellis’ pending motions for appointment of
counsel, an emergency dental exam and treatment, transcripts at
government expense, a copy of his dental records, and for
injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2