Filed: Jan. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1851 GLENDA FALWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenda Falwell, Appellant Pr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1851 GLENDA FALWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenda Falwell, Appellant Pro..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1851 GLENDA FALWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glenda Falwell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Glenda Falwell appeals the district court’s order dismissing her emergency motion for return of child and denying her motion for an extension of time to file proof of legal custody of the minor child. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Falwell v. Kennedy Krieger Inst., No. 1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010). We deny Falwell’s motion to amend the caption and grant her motion to amend her informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
