Filed: Jan. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2128 LUIS R. QUINONEZ, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Division of Child Support Services; VALERIE CUFFEE; LEWIS, and other employees of DCSE and JDR Court System, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00991-LMB-IDD) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2128 LUIS R. QUINONEZ, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Division of Child Support Services; VALERIE CUFFEE; LEWIS, and other employees of DCSE and JDR Court System, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00991-LMB-IDD) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before M..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2128
LUIS R. QUINONEZ,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Division of Child Support
Services; VALERIE CUFFEE; LEWIS, and other employees of
DCSE and JDR Court System,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00991-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luis R. Quinonez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Luis R. Quinonez appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Quinonez v. Virginia, No. 1:10-cv-00991-LMB-IDD (E.D.
Va. filed Sept. 1 & entered Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2