Filed: Jan. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2365 In Re: JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, al
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2365 In Re: JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, all..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2365 In Re: JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to void the judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion December 10, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gore’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
