Filed: Jan. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7298 MARVIN GAYE ROBINSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. G. M. HINKLE, Chief Warden; T. MILLS, C/O Security; HITCH, C/O Security; BANKS, Sergeant; B. HAIRSTON, C/O Security; ROBIN HULBERT, Director Mental Health; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director Department of Corrections, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-0055
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7298 MARVIN GAYE ROBINSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. G. M. HINKLE, Chief Warden; T. MILLS, C/O Security; HITCH, C/O Security; BANKS, Sergeant; B. HAIRSTON, C/O Security; ROBIN HULBERT, Director Mental Health; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director Department of Corrections, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00550..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7298
MARVIN GAYE ROBINSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
G. M. HINKLE, Chief Warden; T. MILLS, C/O Security; HITCH,
C/O Security; BANKS, Sergeant; B. HAIRSTON, C/O Security;
ROBIN HULBERT, Director Mental Health; GENE M. JOHNSON,
Director Department of Corrections,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00550-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin Gaye Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marvin Gaye Robinson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Robinson v. Hinkle, No. 1:10-cv-00550-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va.
filed July 27, 2010 & entered July 28, 2010). We deny
Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2