Filed: Feb. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1351 MARKELLA COUNTOUROUDAS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VANCE SECURITY USA CORPORATION, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00548-LMB-TCB) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1351 MARKELLA COUNTOUROUDAS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. VANCE SECURITY USA CORPORATION, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00548-LMB-TCB) Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011 Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1351
MARKELLA COUNTOUROUDAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VANCE SECURITY USA CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00548-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: February 15, 2011
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda M. Correia, WEBSTER, FREDRICKSON, CORREIA & PUTH, PLLC,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Tyler A. Brown, JACKSON LEWIS,
LLP, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Markella Countouroudas appeals the district court’s
order granting Vance Security USA Corporation’s Fed. R. Civ. P.
52(c) motion for judgment on partial findings after a bench
trial on Countouroudas’s pregnancy and gender discrimination
claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 &
Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and
judgment. Countouroudas v. Vance Sec. USA Corp., No. 1:09-cv-
00548-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2