Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Floyd v. IRS, 19-1334 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-1334 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1881 BILLY D. FLOYD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00066-FDW-DSC) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1881 BILLY D. FLOYD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00066-FDW-DSC) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy D. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Anne E. Blaess, Robert William Metzler, John A. Nolet, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Billy D. Floyd appeals from the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his mandamus petition in which he sought to enjoin the United States from seizing his property to collect on a tax liability he disputes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Floyd v. Comm’r. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 3:10-cv-00066-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer