Filed: Mar. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7183 JERRY ALEXANDER CANZATER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN A. J. PADULA, Lee Correctional Institution; MS. BELL, Associate Warden Lee Correctional Institution; MR. OBERMAN, Classification; MS. HILTON, Classification, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:09-cv-02197-HMH) Submitted: February
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7183 JERRY ALEXANDER CANZATER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN A. J. PADULA, Lee Correctional Institution; MS. BELL, Associate Warden Lee Correctional Institution; MR. OBERMAN, Classification; MS. HILTON, Classification, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:09-cv-02197-HMH) Submitted: February 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7183
JERRY ALEXANDER CANZATER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN A. J. PADULA, Lee Correctional Institution; MS. BELL,
Associate Warden Lee Correctional Institution; MR. OBERMAN,
Classification; MS. HILTON, Classification,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (0:09-cv-02197-HMH)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Alexander Canzater, Appellant Pro Se. Walker Heinitsh
Willcox, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Alexander Canzater appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Canzater v. Padula, No. 0:09-cv-02197-HMH (D.S.C.
Aug. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2