Filed: Mar. 09, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7225 MALCOLM WRIGHT, JR., a/k/a Malcolm Y. Azariah, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; BETTY BROWN, Head Chaplain Services; BETTY POPE, Head Dietician Other Paula Pope; MR. BRANKER, Warden; JACKIE PARKER, Chief of Food and Nutrition Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7225 MALCOLM WRIGHT, JR., a/k/a Malcolm Y. Azariah, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; BETTY BROWN, Head Chaplain Services; BETTY POPE, Head Dietician Other Paula Pope; MR. BRANKER, Warden; JACKIE PARKER, Chief of Food and Nutrition Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7225
MALCOLM WRIGHT, JR., a/k/a Malcolm Y. Azariah,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons; BETTY BROWN, Head
Chaplain Services; BETTY POPE, Head Dietician Other Paula
Pope; MR. BRANKER, Warden; JACKIE PARKER, Chief of Food and
Nutrition Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03129-BO)
Submitted: December 2, 2010 Decided: March 9, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Wright, Jr., appeals a district court order
granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his
complaint brought under the Religious Land Use and
Institutionalized Persons Act, Pub. L. No. 106-274, 114 Stat.
804, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a) (2006) (“RLUIPA”). He also appeals
the order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm
for the reasons cited by the district court. See Wright v.
Bennett, No. 5:08-ct-03129-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2010; Aug. 25,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2