Filed: Apr. 13, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1697 KAKHA KAKHETELIDZE, a/k/a Kakha Kakhelidze, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 29, 2011 Decided: April 13, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander J. Segal, GRINBERG & SEGAL, P.L.L.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1697 KAKHA KAKHETELIDZE, a/k/a Kakha Kakhelidze, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: March 29, 2011 Decided: April 13, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander J. Segal, GRINBERG & SEGAL, P.L.L.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony W..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1697
KAKHA KAKHETELIDZE, a/k/a Kakha Kakhelidze,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: March 29, 2011 Decided: April 13, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander J. Segal, GRINBERG & SEGAL, P.L.L.C., New York, New
York, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General,
Paul Fiorino, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lisa Morinelli, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Office of Immigration Litigation,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kakha Kakhetelidze, a native and citizen of Georgia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration
Judge’s denial of his application for adjustment of status. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and affirm the
denial of relief for the reasons stated by the Board. In re:
Kakhetelidze (B.I.A. June 4, 2010); see 8 U.S.C.A.
§ 1183a(f)(5)(B)(i) (West Supp. 2010). Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2