Filed: Apr. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7137 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TAVON ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cr-00074-WDQ-1; 1:09-cv-02305-WDQ) Submitted: April 19, 2011 Decided: April 21, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Seth Allen Neyhar
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7137 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TAVON ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cr-00074-WDQ-1; 1:09-cv-02305-WDQ) Submitted: April 19, 2011 Decided: April 21, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Seth Allen Neyhart..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7137
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TAVON ROBINSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:06-cr-00074-WDQ-1; 1:09-cv-02305-WDQ)
Submitted: April 19, 2011 Decided: April 21, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Seth Allen Neyhart, STARK LAW GROUP, PLLC, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Kwame Jangha Manley, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tavon Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010)
motion. That order was entered by the district court on
February 19, 2010. Robinson, then a prisoner proceeding pro se,
filed his notice of appeal between August 9 and August 11, 2010. *
Robinson’s notice of appeal is clearly untimely. See Fed. R.
App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). In his notice, however, Robinson indicated
that he never received the district court’s order. Under Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(6), the district court may reopen the time to
file an appeal for a fourteen-day period if: (1) the moving
party did not receive notice of entry of judgment within twenty-
one days after its entry; (2) a motion to reopen the appeal
period is filed within 180 days of entry of judgment or within
fourteen days of receiving notice from the district court,
whichever is earlier; and (3) no party would be prejudiced by
reopening. We remand to the district court for the limited
purpose of determining whether Robinson is entitled to have his
time to file an appeal reopened under Rule 4(a)(6). The record,
*
Robinson hand-dated his notice of appeal August 9, 2010;
the prison mail room dated it August 11, 2010.
2
as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further
consideration.
REMANDED
3