Filed: Apr. 26, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2433 ALPHONZO CRAIGHEAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00981-JCC) Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonzo
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2433 ALPHONZO CRAIGHEAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00981-JCC) Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonzo ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2433
ALPHONZO CRAIGHEAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00981-JCC)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphonzo Craighead, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Michele
Corchiarino, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alphonzo Craighead appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice in part and with prejudice in part
his Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681(u) (2006)
and Virginia state law claims against Nissan Motor Acceptance
Corporation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Craighead v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., No.
1:10-cv-00981-JCC (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2