Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard v. United States, 10-2337 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-2337 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 27, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2337 SIMON L. RICHARD; PATRICIA M. RICHARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00562-GBL-TCB) Submitted: April 7, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Simon L.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2337 SIMON L. RICHARD; PATRICIA M. RICHARD, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00562-GBL-TCB) Submitted: April 7, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Simon L. Richard, Patricia M. Richard, Appellants Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Kenneth L. Greene, Supervisory Attorney, Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint concerning a tax lien for taxes owed on their 1991 and 1992 taxes, and a tax lien and garnishment related to their 1993 and 1997 tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richard v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-00562-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer