Filed: Apr. 27, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6058 TRAVIS MCCLINTON LEWIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MS. JEHUA, LPN; SETH WIREKOH, LPN; EDWARD ADUSEI, LPN; OFFICER WEAKLEY, Guard, Defendants – Appellees, and MS. WALLACE, Ombudsman, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00398-MSD-DEM) Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6058 TRAVIS MCCLINTON LEWIS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MS. JEHUA, LPN; SETH WIREKOH, LPN; EDWARD ADUSEI, LPN; OFFICER WEAKLEY, Guard, Defendants – Appellees, and MS. WALLACE, Ombudsman, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00398-MSD-DEM) Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6058
TRAVIS MCCLINTON LEWIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MS. JEHUA, LPN; SETH WIREKOH, LPN; EDWARD ADUSEI, LPN;
OFFICER WEAKLEY, Guard,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MS. WALLACE, Ombudsman,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00398-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis McClinton Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner,
HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Travis McClinton Lewis appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lewis v. Jehua, No. 2:08-cv-00398-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va.
Dec. 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3