Filed: Apr. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7593 JOHN JAMES BELL, a/k/a Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DORIS ANN COOKE, RN; DOCTOR M. BEINOR; P. HOUGH, Inmate Grievance Coordinator; WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JENNIE MCKAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:10-cv-00398-HFF) Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 29, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7593 JOHN JAMES BELL, a/k/a Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DORIS ANN COOKE, RN; DOCTOR M. BEINOR; P. HOUGH, Inmate Grievance Coordinator; WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JENNIE MCKAY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:10-cv-00398-HFF) Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 29, 201..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7593
JOHN JAMES BELL, a/k/a Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DORIS ANN COOKE, RN; DOCTOR M. BEINOR; P. HOUGH, Inmate
Grievance Coordinator; WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS; ASSOCIATE
WARDEN JENNIE MCKAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(8:10-cv-00398-HFF)
Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 29, 2011
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John James Bell, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John James Bell appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v.
Cooke, No. 8:10-cv-00398-HFF (D.S.C. Nov. 2, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2