Filed: May 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6232 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-JAB-1) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Dennard M
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6232 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-JAB-1) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Dennard Mc..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-JAB-1)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael
Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina; Paul Alexander Weinman,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-
00070-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2