Filed: May 18, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2200 JACQUELINE R. CARROLL-HALL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THE ARC OF BALTIMORE; RON CHRISTIAN; DELE SANGODEYI; MONIQUE DUBOIS; SHAREEN JONES; KEVIN PUSHIA; CHRYSTIE NICHOLSON; KIM MEEKINS; RYAN REIF; OLU FATODU; ALAN CAMPBELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00873-RDB) Submitted: April 29, 2011 Deci
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2200 JACQUELINE R. CARROLL-HALL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THE ARC OF BALTIMORE; RON CHRISTIAN; DELE SANGODEYI; MONIQUE DUBOIS; SHAREEN JONES; KEVIN PUSHIA; CHRYSTIE NICHOLSON; KIM MEEKINS; RYAN REIF; OLU FATODU; ALAN CAMPBELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00873-RDB) Submitted: April 29, 2011 Decid..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2200
JACQUELINE R. CARROLL-HALL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE ARC OF BALTIMORE; RON CHRISTIAN; DELE SANGODEYI;
MONIQUE DUBOIS; SHAREEN JONES; KEVIN PUSHIA; CHRYSTIE
NICHOLSON; KIM MEEKINS; RYAN REIF; OLU FATODU; ALAN
CAMPBELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-00873-RDB)
Submitted: April 29, 2011 Decided: May 18, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee
Jacobson, BLADES & ROSENFELD, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall appeals the district
court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her
complaint alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West
2003 & Supp. 2010), and under the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634
(West 2008 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Carroll-Hall v. The Arc of
Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-00873-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2