Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Liggins v. Bouffault, 10-2239 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-2239 Visitors: 24
Filed: May 20, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2239 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants – Appellees. No. 11-1083 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants – Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc) Submitted
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2239 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants – Appellees. No. 11-1083 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants – Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc) Submitted: May 3, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Leann Haney, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on the jury verdict, and denying his motion for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd., No. 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2010; Dec. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer