Filed: May 20, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7376 ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, Petitioner – Appellant, v. ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prisons; MICHAEL J. LAMM, Superintendent; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION; ALLEN W. KELLER, JR., Secretary of State, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld, Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-00129-JAB-LPA) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7376 ANTHONY LEON HOOVER, Petitioner – Appellant, v. ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prisons; MICHAEL J. LAMM, Superintendent; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION; ALLEN W. KELLER, JR., Secretary of State, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld, Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-00129-JAB-LPA) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7376
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prisons; MICHAEL J. LAMM,
Superintendent; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION;
ALLEN W. KELLER, JR., Secretary of State,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld,
Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-00129-JAB-LPA)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,
III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal an unspecified
order allegedly entered on September 23, 2010. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Hoover seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order, and his notice of
appeal was premature as to the final order in his proceeding.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
deny Hoover’s motions to compel, for a temporary restraining
order, and for a Federal Marshal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2