Filed: Jun. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6332 RYAN PILARTE-HARRIGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN OWENS; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00885-HMH) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ryan Pilar
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6332 RYAN PILARTE-HARRIGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN OWENS; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00885-HMH) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ryan Pilart..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6332
RYAN PILARTE-HARRIGAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OWENS; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00885-HMH)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan Pilarte-Harrigan, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Pilarte-Harrigan, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Pilarte-Harrigan v.
Owens, No. 3:10-cv-00885-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2