Filed: Jun. 02, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7695 MARK A. BARNES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KATHERINE BRAUN, Lawyer/Public Defender; KATHLEEN ORTIZ, Head Public Defender, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01268-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 18, 2011 Decided: June 2, 2011 Before DAVIS and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7695 MARK A. BARNES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. KATHERINE BRAUN, Lawyer/Public Defender; KATHLEEN ORTIZ, Head Public Defender, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01268-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 18, 2011 Decided: June 2, 2011 Before DAVIS and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7695
MARK A. BARNES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KATHERINE BRAUN, Lawyer/Public Defender; KATHLEEN ORTIZ,
Head Public Defender,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01268-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: May 18, 2011 Decided: June 2, 2011
Before DAVIS and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Guy Winston Horsley, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Barnes appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Barnes v. Braun, No. 1:10-cv-01268-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va.
Nov. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2