Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sirko v. Town Council of Centreville, 10-2119 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-2119 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2119 WANDA SIRKO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Andrews, Deceased, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE, Defendant – Appellee, and DANIEL JAY SAVAGE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00552-JFM) Submitted: May 27, 2011 Decided: June 3, 2011 Before KING and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2119 WANDA SIRKO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Andrews, Deceased, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOWN COUNCIL OF CENTREVILLE, Defendant – Appellee, and DANIEL JAY SAVAGE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00552-JFM) Submitted: May 27, 2011 Decided: June 3, 2011 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel H. Paavola, PAAVOLA AND PAAVOLA PA, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Steven R. Migdal, BUCK, MIGDAL & MYERS, CHARTERED, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wanda Sirko appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Town Council of Centreville, on the underlying wrongful death action. Sirko’s complaint alleged that the Town of Centreville was responsible for the death of her father, who was killed in an automobile accident by a driver eluding a police chase. We have reviewed the record on appeal as well as the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sirko v. Town Council of Centreville, No. 1:09-cv-00552-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer