Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Libertarian Party of Virginia v. VA State Board of Elections, 10-2175 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-2175 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2175 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA; MATTHEW MOSLEY; WILBUR WOOD; WILLIAM REDPATH; CATHERINE BARRETT; ROBERT BENEDICT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. VA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00615-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 13, 2011 Decided: June 3, 2011 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2175 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA; MATTHEW MOSLEY; WILBUR WOOD; WILLIAM REDPATH; CATHERINE BARRETT; ROBERT BENEDICT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. VA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00615-LMB-TCB) Submitted: May 13, 2011 Decided: June 3, 2011 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Sinawski, Brooklyn, New York, for Appellants. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General of Virginia, E. Duncan Getchell, Jr., Solicitor General, Stephen R. McCullough, Senior Appellate Counsel, Charles E. James, Jr., Chief Deputy Attorney General, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: The Libertarian Party of Virginia, Matthew Mosley, Wilbur Wood, William Redpath, Catherine Barrett, and Robert Benedict appeal the district court’s order granting the Virginia State Board of Elections’ motion to dismiss. After reviewing the record and the district court’s opinion, we agree that the Appellants’ suit is barred by the Eleventh Amendment and therefore affirm. See Libertarian Party of Va. v. Va. St. Bd. of Elections, No. 1:10-cv-00615-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer