Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States Ex Rel. Farmer v. Skeen, 6577 (1953)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 6577 Visitors: 23
Filed: May 01, 1953
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 203 F.2d 950 UNITED STATES ex rel. FARMER, v. SKEEN. No. 6577. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1953. Decided May 1, 1953. A. B. Farmer, pro se. John G. Fox, Atty. Gen. of W. Va., and T. D. Kauffelt, Asst. Atty. Gen. of W. Va., on the brief, for appellee. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This is an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus to appellant, who was convicted of crime in a West Virginia state co
More

203 F.2d 950

UNITED STATES ex rel. FARMER,
v.
SKEEN.

No. 6577.

United States Court of Appeals
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 1953.
Decided May 1, 1953.

A. B. Farmer, pro se.

John G. Fox, Atty. Gen. of W. Va., and T. D. Kauffelt, Asst. Atty. Gen. of W. Va., on the brief, for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus to appellant, who was convicted of crime in a West Virginia state court and is imprisoned under the judgment and sentence of that court. Prior to filing the petition in the court below, appellant had attacked the judgment and sentence in a habeas corpus proceeding in the courts of the state and had there been denied relief in a judgment which had been affirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of the state. Ex parte Farmer, 123 W.Va. 304, 14 S.E.2d 910. As no application to the Supreme Court of the United States was made to review that decision by certiorari, remedies under state law were not exhausted. Darr v. Buford, Warden, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S. Ct. 587, 94 L. Ed. 761. Furthermore, the judge below was acting within the limits of his discretion in not issuing the writ when it appeared that all questions raised in the petition before him had been thoroughly examined and acted upon by the state courts. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 457-458, 73 S. Ct. 397, 437. We would accordingly affirm the decision below if the case were properly before us. The appeal must be dismissed, however, for failure of appellant to obtain the certificate of probable cause required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Berman v. Swenson, Warden, 4 Cir., 177 F.2d 717.

2

Appeal dismissed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer