Filed: Dec. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1586 SANTOS SARBELIO FUNES CRUZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: November 13, 2013 Decided: December 4, 2013 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Suhr, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. SUHR, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Stua
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1586 SANTOS SARBELIO FUNES CRUZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: November 13, 2013 Decided: December 4, 2013 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul A. Suhr, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. SUHR, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioner. Stuar..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1586
SANTOS SARBELIO FUNES CRUZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: November 13, 2013 Decided: December 4, 2013
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul A. Suhr, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. SUHR, PLLC, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney
General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Lindsay B.
Glauner, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Santos Sarbelio Funes Cruz, a native and citizen of El
Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration
Judge’s decision declining to reopen proceedings due to Funes
Cruz’s failure to establish a prima facie claim for the relief
of cancellation of removal. We have reviewed the administrative
record and Funes Cruz’s claims and conclude that we lack
jurisdiction over the petition for review. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (a)(2)(D) (2012); Sorcia v. Holder,
643 F.3d
117, 124-25 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
132 S. Ct. 776 (2011).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2