Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tatyana Ishutkina v. General Dynamics Corporation, 13-1885 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1885 Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1885 TATYANA ISHUTKINA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01290-TSE-JFA) Submitted: November 22, 2013 Decided: December 5, 2013 Before KING, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tatyana Ishutkin
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1885 TATYANA ISHUTKINA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01290-TSE-JFA) Submitted: November 22, 2013 Decided: December 5, 2013 Before KING, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tatyana Ishutkina, Appellant Pro Se. Joleen Okun, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C.; Stephen William Robinson, Melissa Lee Taylormoore, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tatyana Ishutkina appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to transfer a case from Fairfax Circuit Court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ishutkina v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., No. 1:12-cv-01290-TSE- JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 27 & entered June 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer