Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7574 JAMES C. PLATTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARY BETH BUCHANAN; JOHN JEFFREY MILLER; HAROLD STANTON; NINA M. MIKLOS; LISA DICERBO; ROSEMARY PAGUNI; JEAN M. TRIPP; PATRICK J. THOMASSEY; STEVEN TOWNSEND; DONETTA W. AMBROSE; LISA B. FREELAND; TOM LIVINGSTON; KAREN GERLACH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7574 JAMES C. PLATTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARY BETH BUCHANAN; JOHN JEFFREY MILLER; HAROLD STANTON; NINA M. MIKLOS; LISA DICERBO; ROSEMARY PAGUNI; JEAN M. TRIPP; PATRICK J. THOMASSEY; STEVEN TOWNSEND; DONETTA W. AMBROSE; LISA B. FREELAND; TOM LIVINGSTON; KAREN GERLACH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief Di..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7574
JAMES C. PLATTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY BETH BUCHANAN; JOHN JEFFREY MILLER; HAROLD STANTON;
NINA M. MIKLOS; LISA DICERBO; ROSEMARY PAGUNI; JEAN M.
TRIPP; PATRICK J. THOMASSEY; STEVEN TOWNSEND; DONETTA W.
AMBROSE; LISA B. FREELAND; TOM LIVINGSTON; KAREN GERLACH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:13-cv-00042-JPB-JES)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James C. Platts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James C. Platts appeals the district court’s order and
judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Platts v. Buchanan, No. 2:13-cv-
00042-JPB-JES (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 12, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2