Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7795 DAVID MYRON SUIRE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE COMMISSIONER; WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03106-JKB) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Myron S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7795 DAVID MYRON SUIRE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE COMMISSIONER; WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03106-JKB) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Myron Su..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7795
DAVID MYRON SUIRE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE COMMISSIONER; WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03106-JKB)
Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Myron Suire, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Myron Suire appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Suire v. State Comm’r, No. 1:13-cv-03106-JKB
(D. Md. Oct. 24, 2013). We also deny Suire’s motion to assign
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2