Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

9344 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 9344 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 15, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 333 F.2d 603 64-2 USTC P 9586 Norman A. GRANT and Genevieve K. Grant, Wallace F. Holladay and Wilhelmina Cole Holladay, Henry J. Kaufman and Irma N. Kaufman, Frank J. Luchs and Elizabeth Luchs, Maurice D. Rosenberg, Jr., and Charlotte R. Rosenberg, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 9344. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued April 17, 1964. Decided June 15, 1964. John P. Lipscomb, Washington, D.C. (George W. Beatty, Philip S. Peyser and William E.
More

333 F.2d 603

64-2 USTC P 9586

Norman A. GRANT and Genevieve K. Grant, Wallace F. Holladay
and Wilhelmina Cole Holladay, Henry J. Kaufman and Irma N.
Kaufman, Frank J. Luchs and Elizabeth Luchs, Maurice D.
Rosenberg, Jr., and Charlotte R. Rosenberg, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 9344.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 17, 1964.
Decided June 15, 1964.

John P. Lipscomb, Washington, D.C. (George W. Beatty, Philip S. Peyser and William E. Rollow, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioners.

Myron C. Baum, Attorney, Department of Justice (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Michael K. Cavanaugh and Stephen B. Wolfberg, Attorneys, Department of Justice, on brief), for respondent.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Determination of whether the taxpayer realized ordinary income on capital gains from sales of land and options for land is presented by this petition of review of the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States in these consolidated cases. The Tax Court held that petitioners' gains were from the sale of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of petitioners' business and were taxable to them as ordinary income. Our review of the record, and consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel lead us to the conclusion that the Tax Court correctly decided these consolidated cases. Upon the Tax Court's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion the decisions of the Tax Court are

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer