Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Chijioke Akamiro, 13-1959 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-1959 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1959 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CHIJIOKE AKAMIRO, Default Noted 3/21/2013, Defendant – Appellant, and FREDERICK STARKES, Default Noted 3/21/2013, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00055-MSD-DEM) Submitted: December 20, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014 Before WYNN and THACKER, Circu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1959 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CHIJIOKE AKAMIRO, Default Noted 3/21/2013, Defendant – Appellant, and FREDERICK STARKES, Default Noted 3/21/2013, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00055-MSD-DEM) Submitted: December 20, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014 Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chijioke Akamiro, Appellant Pro Se. Theodore Ira Brenner, BRENNER, EVANS & MILLMAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chijioke Akamiro appeals the district court’s order granting State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s unopposed motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 for a default judgment in this action for a declaratory judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Akamiro, No. 2:13-cv-00055-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. July 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer