Filed: Jan. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2494 KOKOU LOGOSSOU, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: December 16, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014 Before MOTZ, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda A. Dominguez, L.A. DOMINGUEZ LAW, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant United
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2494 KOKOU LOGOSSOU, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: December 16, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014 Before MOTZ, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda A. Dominguez, L.A. DOMINGUEZ LAW, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant United ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2494
KOKOU LOGOSSOU,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: December 16, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014
Before MOTZ, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linda A. Dominguez, L.A. DOMINGUEZ LAW, LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant United
States Attorney, Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Kelly J.
Walls, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kokou Logossou, a native and citizen of Togo,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of
discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013); Narine v. Holder,
559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of
review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. In re: Logossou (B.I.A. Nov. 8,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2