Filed: Jan. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1992 ANTWAN EUGENE FORD SEN EL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RACHEL ANN FESTA FLEMING, Judge; HERMAN MELVIN HOWELL, Judge, Defendants – Appellees, and CLOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHILLIP HAWKINS, #311; C. B. FORD, #304; SGT. CALDWELL, #319; SELESTINO, #305, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:13-cv-00446-CMC-P
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1992 ANTWAN EUGENE FORD SEN EL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. RACHEL ANN FESTA FLEMING, Judge; HERMAN MELVIN HOWELL, Judge, Defendants – Appellees, and CLOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHILLIP HAWKINS, #311; C. B. FORD, #304; SGT. CALDWELL, #319; SELESTINO, #305, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:13-cv-00446-CMC-PJ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1992
ANTWAN EUGENE FORD SEN EL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RACHEL ANN FESTA FLEMING, Judge; HERMAN MELVIN HOWELL,
Judge,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CLOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT; PHILLIP HAWKINS, #311; C. B.
FORD, #304; SGT. CALDWELL, #319; SELESTINO, #305,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
District Judge. (0:13-cv-00446-CMC-PJG)
Submitted: December 17, 2013 Decided: January 13, 2014
Before KING, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antwan Eugene Ford Sen El seeks to appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing Defendants Judge Fleming and Judge Howell
without prejudice from this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The order Sen El seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2