Filed: Jan. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7281 WILLIAM T. COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WINTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT; SERGEANT DEWAYNE BUNCH; UNKNOWN WINTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFENDANTS, may be amended, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:12-cv-01915-JFA) Submitted: December 27, 2013 Decided: January 16, 2014 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7281 WILLIAM T. COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WINTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT; SERGEANT DEWAYNE BUNCH; UNKNOWN WINTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFENDANTS, may be amended, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:12-cv-01915-JFA) Submitted: December 27, 2013 Decided: January 16, 2014 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7281
WILLIAM T. COLEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WINTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT; SERGEANT DEWAYNE BUNCH; UNKNOWN
WINTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFENDANTS, may be amended,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (0:12-cv-01915-JFA)
Submitted: December 27, 2013 Decided: January 16, 2014
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William T. Coleman appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Coleman v. Winthrop Police Dep’t, No.
0:12-cv-01915-JFA (D.S.C. July 29, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2