Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Russell Purdue, 13-7453 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-7453 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7453 ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RUSSELL A. PURDUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00129-FPS-JSK) Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abd
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 13-7453


ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD,

                Petitioner - Appellant,

          v.

RUSSELL A. PURDUE,

                Respondent - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.     Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00129-FPS-JSK)


Submitted:   January 21, 2014               Decided: January 24, 2014


Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.     Helen Campbell
Altmeyer,   Jarod   James   Douglas,  Assistant   United  States
Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Abdul-Aziz     Rashid       Muhammad,   a    federal    prisoner,

appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2012) petition.      We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.       Muhammad v. Purdue, No. 5:12-cv-00129-

FPS-JSK   (N.D.W.   Va.   Aug.   23,    2013).     We   dispense   with   oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.



                                                                    AFFIRMED




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer