Filed: Feb. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4615 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1) Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: February 18, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4615 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1) Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: February 18, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-4615
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: February 18, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Russell Warren Mace, III, THE MACE FIRM, Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States
Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s
judgment in a criminal case pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See
United States v. Williams, 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 16,
2013); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012); United States v.
Black,
737 F.3d 280, 286-87 (4th Cir. 2013); United States v.
Fraley,
988 F.2d 4, 6-7 (4th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2