Filed: Feb. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2029 DAVID ALUVALE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00178-AJT-TRJ) Submitted: January 31, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2029 DAVID ALUVALE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00178-AJT-TRJ) Submitted: January 31, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014 Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2029
DAVID ALUVALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00178-AJT-TRJ)
Submitted: January 31, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Aluvale, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, Crystal L.
Tyler, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Aluvale appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant on Aluvale’s claim of
discriminatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003
& Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Aluvale v. Truland Sys. Corp., No. 1:13-
cv-00178-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2013; see Summ. J. Tr. 12-
18, Aug. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2