Filed: Feb. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2233 MINH VU HOANG, Debtor - Appellant, THANH HOANG, Debtor, v. GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee – Appellee, and U.S. TRUSTEE, Greenbelt, 11, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:12-cv-03184-DKC; 05-21078) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2233 MINH VU HOANG, Debtor - Appellant, THANH HOANG, Debtor, v. GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee – Appellee, and U.S. TRUSTEE, Greenbelt, 11, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:12-cv-03184-DKC; 05-21078) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2233 MINH VU HOANG, Debtor - Appellant, THANH HOANG, Debtor, v. GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee – Appellee, and U.S. TRUSTEE, Greenbelt, 11, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:12-cv-03184-DKC; 05-21078) Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Minh Vu Hoang, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Minh Vu Hoang appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders granting the trustee’s turnover motion and denying her motion in limine to exclude certain expert testimony. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoang v. Rosen, No. 8:12-cv- 03184-DKC (D. Md. filed Sept. 6, 2013, and filed Oct. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
