Filed: Feb. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7587 LORD VERSATILE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison; A. F. MILLER, Operations Officer, Warden - Designee, Sussex I State Prison; R. W. SPROUSE, CO, Investigator, Sussex I State Prison; W. BROWN, Hearings Officer, Sussex I State Prison, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Distr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7587 LORD VERSATILE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison; A. F. MILLER, Operations Officer, Warden - Designee, Sussex I State Prison; R. W. SPROUSE, CO, Investigator, Sussex I State Prison; W. BROWN, Hearings Officer, Sussex I State Prison, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Distri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7587
LORD VERSATILE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA KELLY, Warden (Former), Sussex I State Prison; A. F.
MILLER, Operations Officer, Warden - Designee, Sussex I
State Prison; R. W. SPROUSE, CO, Investigator, Sussex I
State Prison; W. BROWN, Hearings Officer, Sussex I State
Prison,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-00333-HEH)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lord Versatile, a Virginia inmate, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Versatile v. Kelly, No. 3:12-cv-00333-
HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2