Filed: Mar. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1883 SEBASTIAN BUSTOS AYON, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: February 21, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel G. Anna, ANNA & ANNA, P.C., Media, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Greg D. Mack, Kathry
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1883 SEBASTIAN BUSTOS AYON, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: February 21, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel G. Anna, ANNA & ANNA, P.C., Media, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Greg D. Mack, Kathryn..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1883
SEBASTIAN BUSTOS AYON,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: February 21, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel G. Anna, ANNA & ANNA, P.C., Media, Pennsylvania, for
Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Greg D. Mack, Kathryn L.
Deangelis, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sebastian Bustos Ayon, a native and citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration
judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of
removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript
of Ayon’s merits hearing, and his supporting affidavit and
evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel
a ruling contrary to any of the Board’s factual findings, see 8
U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias,
502
U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review finding
that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See In
re: Ayon (B.I.A. June 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2