Filed: Mar. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7940 RODNEY DAVID YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIN; TAMMY HAMILTON; DR. MARY HAMMOND; LIEUTENANT D. SISCO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03009-TMC) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7940 RODNEY DAVID YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIN; TAMMY HAMILTON; DR. MARY HAMMOND; LIEUTENANT D. SISCO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03009-TMC) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7940
RODNEY DAVID YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIN; TAMMY HAMILTON; DR. MARY HAMMOND;
LIEUTENANT D. SISCO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-03009-TMC)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Heyward
Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL &
COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; Russell W. Harter, Jr.,
CHAPMAN, HARTER & HARTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rodney David Young appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Young v. Griffin, No. 1:12-cv-03009-TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 15, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2