Filed: Mar. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7947 CHRISTOPHER GIBBS, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE COMMISSIONER # 2124, c/o Wicomico County Detention Center Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-03108-PWG) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-7947 CHRISTOPHER GIBBS, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE COMMISSIONER # 2124, c/o Wicomico County Detention Center Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-03108-PWG) Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7947
CHRISTOPHER GIBBS, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE COMMISSIONER # 2124, c/o Wicomico County Detention
Center
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-
cv-03108-PWG)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Gibbs, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Gibbs, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action without prejudice pursuant to
Younger v. Harris,
401 U.S. 37 (1977). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Gibbs v. State Comm’r
# 2124, No. 8:13-cv-03108-PWG (D. Md. Nov. 15, 2013). We deny
Gibbs’ motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2