Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael Knights v. Oxford Global Resources, 13-2045 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-2045 Visitors: 44
Filed: Mar. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2045 MICHAEL KNIGHTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OXFORD GLOBAL RESOURCES, (Contracting Capacity); STIHL INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); EARL SYKES, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); GUY WALLACE, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virgi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2045 MICHAEL KNIGHTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OXFORD GLOBAL RESOURCES, (Contracting Capacity); STIHL INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); EARL SYKES, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); GUY WALLACE, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: January 10, 2014 Decided: March 7, 2014 Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Knights, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Gayle Augustin, Thomas Joseph Flaherty, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, McLean, Virginia; Sarah Kate McConaughy, Robert W. McFarland, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Knights appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260- RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. July 26, 2013). We grant Knights leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer